|
What's
Wrong With The Light? A IMSA
Brochure to help the public
understand traffic control systems.
When Are Traffic Signals Installed?
Traffic signals have been used for many decades to control traffic
flow. This has provided engineers opportunities to study their positive
and negative impacts, to identify when signals should be installed
and to determine how they should be operated. National and state
standards have been developed in order to provide uniformity and
maximum benefit to the public.
When used under the right conditions, traffic signals may improve
traffic flow and safety. In considering when and where traffic signals
should be installed, engineers gather information on traffic flows.
This may include the amount of vehicle traffic for each fifteen
minutes period of the day, the direction of traffic, turning vehicles
and pedestrians and bicyclists (especially near schools). Traffic
speeds and the development in the area are also considered along
with the number of travel lanes available at the location.
Traffic flow information assists in determining the potential impacts
of a traffic signal on travel delays and how many vehicles can be
served by the intersection (capacity). All signals have the potential
to increase delays or decrease capacity to some traffic movement and
decrease delays or increase capacity to other traffic movements. Bot
total delay and capacity impacts and individual movements are considered.
The history of incidents (collisions) at the location are also
reviewed. This is of particular importance since some types of incidents
(such as right angle or broadside) may be reduced in frequency with
the installation of a traffic signal. However, other types of incidents
(such as rear end collisions) may increase with the installation
of a signal. When one street serves a much greater number of vehicles
than the crossing street, the potential for an increase in the frequency
of traffic incidents is higher.
Other considerations include growth trends, potential traffic diversions,
where other future controls in the area may be likely and whether
other changes may be appropriate. The impact on overall traffic
flow upstream and downstream of the signal is also of concern.
Signal Costs
When properly applied, traffic signals represent a sound public
investment in the transportation system. A new traffic signal installation
may cost $75,000 to $125,000. Such expenditures should be made only
when justified and with consideration of other needed projects.
When not properly justified, the cost of a traffic signal is much
greater than the installation cost. Other costs to the public may
include time lost to unnecessary delays, increased frequency of
incidents, increased fuel consumption and pollution and increased
inconveniences and frustration. These wasteful public costs may
easily exceed the installation cost of the signal in a single year.
New Signal Caution
Whenever a new traffic control is installed, the public may need
several months to adjust to the new control. Many drivers need time
to break old driving habits. Although drivers should always drive
with caution, they should be especially careful the first few months
after installation of a new signal.
Traffic Signal Misconceptions
People may request traffic signals based on misconceptions of traffic
signal impacts. For example, persons may hear of one incident, especially
if a fatality occurs, and conclude that a traffic signal should
be installed. As previously stated, traffic signals do not necessarily
reduce the frequency of incidents. In any case, making significant
conclusions from a single or few incidents, especially without knowledge
of the actual incident causes, will typically result in incorrect
actions.
People may also request a traffic signal because it is difficult
to cross or enter a busy street. If this alone were the reason for
installing a traffic signal, busy arterials would have signals at
almost all intersections and driveways, making travel extremely
difficult. Sufficient traffic on cross streets is necessary to justify
stopping major street traffic. The majority of miles traveled is
on arterial streets. If cross streets were signalized at low traffic
volumes, the few moments saved entering or crossing the major street
would be lost many times over in travel along the arterial. In short,
drivers are in the major street flow far more often than they are
in the cross street flow. Even when the cross street volumes are
sufficient to justify stopping the major street flow, the total
delay to traffic may be increased.
Closely spaced traffic signals are of concern since they typically
become more difficult to operate together and minimize stops and
delays along major streets. Close spacing may result in gridlock
when the line of vehicles from a signal backs up into other intersections.
Diversion of traffic may also be a concern, especially if traffic
is encouraged to use residential streets either to reach or avoid
a signal.
This Page Last Updated
Friday, May 18, 2007
|