|

Flood Control / Stormwater Infrastructure
Deficiencies
As first discussed with Council in August of 1999, City and
County stormwater masterplans identified over $44 million in infrastructure
deficiencies in just eight of the twenty-eight basins affecting
the urban area. City Council budgeted $10.9 million worth of projects
and land acquisitions in the 10 year capital improvement program.
Floodplain
Management
The importance of this topic was recently brought to the City's
attention in the fall of 1999 when the State of Colorado FEMA
representatives found mistakes in administering the floodplain/way
around the Mesa Mall area. The City of Grand Junction undertook
further analysis of the floodway in order to determine that all
of the current buildings and a couple of proposed pad sites would
still meet the FEMA guidelines. The City of Grand Junction then
ensured that the flood insurance rate map was revised. The exercise
still stressed the importance of "staying on top" of
floodplain management.
Community Rating System
The NFIP offers reasonably priced flood insurance in communities
that comply with minimum standards for floodplain management.
The NFIP's Community Rating System (CRS) recognizes community
efforts beyond those minimum standards by reducing flood insurance
premiums for the community's property owners. CRS discounts on
flood insurance premiums range from 5% to 45%. Those discounts
provide an incentive for new flood protection activities that
can help save lives and property in the event of a flood. Many
Colorado communities have already been rated, however Grand Junction
and Mesa County have never asked to be rated. Staff believes that
a rating of 8, which would result in a savings of 10% to those
homeowners with flood insurance, is easily obtainable and will
be seeking to rated in the near future. The rating scale extends
from 10 (the worst) to 1 (best). For reference, the best rating
in the country is Tulsa which has attained a level 3. The best
in Colorado is Fort Collins which is at a level 6.
NPDES Phase II Regulations
The City Council was informed on these proposed regulations in
August 1999. The proposed regulations focus primarily on Best Management
Practices (BMP's) and are primarily aimed at increasing the public's
awareness on stormwater. The EPA is leveling the new regulations
against Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4's). Definite
MS4's include City of Fruita, City of Grand Junction, Mesa County,
Grand Junction Drainage District, and many of the irrigation districts.
With so many local entities involved it makes sense to try and pool
resources in meeting the regulations. There are six "minimum"
measures that each MS4's program are required to address: public
education, public involvement, illicit discharge detection and elimination,
construction site stormwater runoff control, post-construction management
of new development, and municipal operations. The City of Grand
Junction is looking at adding very little to its stormwater management
program to meet the regulations; strengthening the code, adding
a public involvement component, issuing construction permits, and
long term enforcement of operation and maintenance of BMP's on private
development can most likely be done with minimal additional staff.
State Rule 37 regulation from the State Water Quality Control
Commission proposes numeric standards for all named and unnamed
tributaries to the Colorado River. This regulation is still in draft
form, however the impacts to Stormwater management could be enormous.
Construction of water quality ponds, currently proposed to meet
NPDES Phase II regulations in 2012 or later, may have to be accelerated
in order to ensure the discharges from the various drainages across
the Grand Valley meet the proposed standards. Because there are
numeric standards, water sampling and lab work would probably mean
up to two additional lab technicians to collect and analyze and
report findings. There is also the possibility of limits being placed
on businesses discharging into the sewer system and expansions to
the Persigo Wastewater Treatment Plant.
This page updated
Tuesday, March 30, 2004
|